Archive · fiscal year 2004

Visa Bulletin for September 2004

Compared with August 2004: 1 lines moved forward, 2 retrogressed, current for all countries: EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, EB-3 Other Workers, EB-4, EB-4 Religious Workers.

Chart A

Final action dates

FamilyAll countriesChinaIndiaMexicoPhilippines
F1Oct 22, 2000–Oct 22, 2000Jan 1, 1992Jul 15, 1990
F2AApr 15, 2000–Apr 15, 2000Sep 15, 1997Apr 15, 2000
F2BJul 1, 1995–Jul 1, 1995Sep 1, 1991−3.0 moJul 1, 1995
F3Oct 15, 1997–Oct 15, 1997May 1, 1992Aug 22, 1987−12.4 mo
F4Aug 15, 1992–Sep 22, 1991+52 dAug 15, 1992Mar 22, 1982
EmploymentAll countriesChinaIndiaMexicoPhilippines
EB-1Current–CurrentCurrentCurrent
EB-2Current–CurrentCurrentCurrent
EB-3Current–CurrentCurrentCurrent
EB-3 Other WorkersCurrent–CurrentCurrentCurrent
EB-4Current–CurrentCurrentCurrent
EB-4 Religious WorkersCurrent–CurrentCurrentCurrent

What moved

Moved forward 1

  • F4India+52 dSep 22, 1991

Retrogressed 2

  • F3Philippines−12.4 moAug 22, 1987
  • F2BMexico−3.0 moSep 1, 1991

What the State Department said

Retrogression of cut-off dates for september

Visa Bulletin number 72, advised readers that continued heavy applicant demand for numbers could require additional retrogressions during September. It has been necessary to retrogress the Mexico F2B and Philippines F3 cut-off dates for September to keep issuances within the annual numerical limits.

With the start of the new fiscal year in October, an attempt will be made to return the cut-off dates to the latest dates established during FY-2004.

U.S. Department of State, Visa Bulletin for September 2004
Determination of the numerical limits on immigrant required under the terms of the immigration and nationality act (INA)

The State Department is required to make a determination of the worldwide numerical limitations, as outlined in Section 201(c) and (d) of the INA, on an annual basis. These calculations are based in part on data provided by the Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS) regarding the number of immediate relative adjustments in the preceding year and the number of aliens paroled into the United States under Section 212(d)(5) in the second preceding year. Without this information, it is impossible to make an official determination of the annual limits. To avoid delays in processing while waiting for the CIS data, the Visa Office (VO) bases allocation on the minimum annual limits outlined in Section 201 of the INA. On July 29 th , CIS provided the required data to VO.

The Department of State has determined the family and employment preference numerical limits for FY-2004 in accordance with the terms of Section 201 of the INA. These numerical limitations for FY-2004 are as follows:

Worldwide Family-Sponsored preference limit: 226,000

Worldwide Employment-Based preference limit: 204,422

Under INA Section 202(A), the per-country limit is fixed at 7% of the family and employment annual limits. For FY-2004 the per-country limit is 30,130. The dependent area annual limit is 2%, or 8,608.

U.S. Department of State, Visa Bulletin for September 2004

Released Aug 11, 2004. Official text: travel.state.gov.

More

Archive

Source: U.S. Department of State, Visa Bulletin (travel.state.gov), every monthly bulletin since 2003, parsed by 77.today. A bulletin can be revised after release; the State Department's page is the binding text. Not legal advice.

Cookies

We measure traffic so we know which stories you care about. You can change your choice at any time.